Twenty-Third Sunday after Pentecost - 23 October 2005 – Rev'd Harvey Smith
The Two Commandments
Three
years ago Bishop Richard Randerson and I organised a one day conference for
members of our Synod. The morning session was in two parts. We asked the Chief
Executive officer of the Auckland Regional Council to come and give us an
overview of how the Council saw the region developing in the next twenty years.
The second session was led by a Professor of Social History at a local
University. He was asked to give his assessment of the Anglican Church and its
readiness to participate in Christ’s reconciling mission to the Auckland
region. Professor Lineham began with by reading a quotation from a book
entitled, “The Death of Christian Britain”.
By so doing he was inviting us to think whether or not the quote might
apply to the Auckland situation. This is what he read.
“This
book is about the death of Christian Britain – the demise of the nation’s
core religious and moral identity. As historical changes go, this has been no
lingering and dawn-out affair. It took several centuries (in what historians
used to call the Dark Ages) to convert Britain to Christianity, but it has taken
less than forty years for the country to forsake it. For a thousand years,
Christianity penetrated deeply into the lives of the people, enduring
Reformation, Enlightenment and industrial revolution by adapting each new social
and cultural context that arose. Then, really quite suddenly in 1963, something
very profound ruptured the character of the nation and its people, sending
organised Christianity on a downward spiral to the margins of social
significance.
In
unprecedented numbers, the British people since the 1960s have stopped going to
church, have allowed their church membership to lapse, have stopped marrying in
church and have neglected to baptise their children. Meanwhile their children,
the two generations who grew to maturity in the last thirty years of the
twentieth century, stopped going to Sunday school, stopped entering confirmation
or communicant classes, and rarely, if ever, stepped inside a church to worship
in their entire lives. The cycle of inter-generational renewal of Christian
affiliation, a cycle which had for so many centuries tied the people however
closely or loosely to the churches and to Christian moral benchmarks, was
permanently disrupted in the ‘swinging sixties’. Since then, a formerly
religious people have entirely forsaken organised Christianity in a sudden
plunge into a truly secular condition.”
The
Auckland Synod was very quick to accept that what was described for Britain
could similarly be described for them.
I
was ordained in 1968. At that time 97% of all New Zealanders belonged to a
Christian denomination. Whilst most people did not go to church, every one knew
which was the church they did not attend. 42% of all Kiwi’s were Anglicans and
they had their babies baptised, all were married in church and all buried their
loved ones in church. Our task was not evangelistic for essentially everyone was
baptised. Our task was to care for the people who turned up to church expecting
traditional worship services, education for their children and pastoral visiting
for the women who almost invariably stayed at home throughout their lives.
Thirty
five years later less than half the New Zealand population choose to belong to a
Christian denomination. The Anglican proportion has fallen to between 12 and
17%. The only walk up crowd Churches see are Christians transferring from one
church to another.
It
did not take a raft of sociological degrees to know that as we hit the end of
the 20th century there was a major disconnect between what the church
was on about and what was happening in the community. Most marriages are now
conducted by marriage celebrants, if in fact people choose to get married in the
first place, funerals are heading the same was as are naming ceremonies for
babies. We could not begin the
Lord’s Prayer and assume that everyone would join in knowing it by rote and
nothing about the Jesus story could be assumed as known. It is not surprising
that the Bishop of Auckland, the largest diocese in New Zealand, called his
diocese a missionary diocese with himself as a missionary bishop.
And
it wasn’t as if the church was not doing anything in those thirty years. We
said ‘no’ to Church Union, ‘yes’ to the remarriage of divorced people,
yes to the ordination of women as deacons, priests and Bishops. Yes to the
charismatic renewal, yes to the Liturgical Renewal as we produced one of the
best prayer books in the Anglican Communion, we said ‘no’ to the Springboks
tour, ‘no’ to poverty,’ ‘yes’ to a rewrite of our Constitution which
produced a radical plan for the sharing of power with our Maori and Polynesian
partners. And whilst all this was taking place the world walked away from us
with ever increasing speed and we never noticed. We were so busy producing just
the very best Church for God that God could ever want.
Now
I hope you will notice that I have carefully not mentioned Australia. That may
perhaps make this one of the least contextual sermons you will ever hear
preached. On the other hand, you might tell me at some later time that there
were resonances in what has been described, such resonances being faint or loud,
with what we are experiencing here in Canberra. If so that would place us
alongside what has been found to be true in many other parts of the English
speaking world. But to proceed with my out of context sermon.
One
of the key Christian thinkers for my generation was John Stott, the Rector of
All Souls, Langham Place in London. He once wrote this:
“Christians
today need to develop the art of double listening. Double listening is the
faculty of listening to two voices at the same time, the voice of God through
Scripture and the voices of men and women around us. These voices will often
contradict one another, but our purpose in listening to them both is to discover
how they relate to each other. Double listening is indispensable to Christian
discipleship and Christian mission.”
That
I think is the trap we fell into. We became single listeners – just to the
scriptures. It is not enough.
I
am not a great movie goer but Kirk Douglas is a name known to me.
I also know in has later years he has become a writer. In one of his
books he tells of his lifelong resolve to pick up hitchhikers whenever feasible.
One afternoon he picked up a sailor on leave. After jumping into the car and
throwing his backpack into the backseat, the sailor did a double take, then a
triple take, and then blurted out to Douglas, “Hey, man, do you know who
you are?”
There
are two fundamental questions in life. “Do you know who you are?” is perhaps
the most fundamental question anyone can ask. And answer. My answer is basic but
complex. It comes from Isaiah 43.4 where God says:
“Because
you are precious in my sight, and honoured, I love you”
And
then from Jesus:
“As
the Father has loved me, so I have loved you” (John 15.9)
I’m
the one Jesus loves.
The
second important question is like the first except for a change of one word.
“From
the Gulf War of 1990-91 comes the story of three British soldiers, stumbling in
the desert. Separated from their troops in the fighting, they were lost, hungry,
and searching for help when they literally bumped into a four-star US American
General.
Excitedly they blurted out, "Do you know where we
are?" The general stiffened. Upset at their lack of protocol and rituals
of respect, he looked down at them and demanded, "Do you know who I am?"
One
of the English soldiers elbowed his buddy and mumbled, "Now we're in deep
trouble. We don't know where we are, and he doesn't know who he is."
Do you know where you are, church? And for us in
Auckland where the church was, was not where the world is and if you are not
close to something or someone, how can you love it?
Remember the words that will come shortly in our
service: “God so loved the world that he sent his only Son….(John 3.16)”
To which we can add some other words of Jesus:
Jesus said, ‘As you sent me into the world,
I have sent them into the world’.(John 15.9)
Jesus said, ‘I pray that all of my
disciples may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they
also be in us so that the world may believe that you have sent me’
(John `17 21).
Jesus said, ‘I pray that the Church be
brought to complete unity to let the world know that you sent me and have
loved them even as you have loved me’. (John 17.23)
We
somehow think that the Church is here for us; we forget that we are the church,
and we’re here for the world.
Clearly,
this out of context sermon has simply sought to have a look at the undergrowth,
this mess of tangles and weeds within which the church has become entrapped and
in my view largely lost its way. We have seen suggested that knowing who we are
and where we are will help us put our energies into God’s direction for our
church and that is the direction of loving the world in order that the world
might come home to God. Perhaps in amongst all this we might find renewed hope
and inspiration from those most basic of Christian teachings, as our Gospel
today has taught, we as Christian people are to live as people who love the Lord
our God with all our heart, and with all our soul, and with all our mind and we
are to love our neighbour as ourselves. And we will notice that as we place the
vertical commandment to God alongside the horizontal commandment to our
neighbour we have formed the Cross which brings us to a proper ending point for
people who fully love the world will have picked up their cross and followed
Jesus.
Harvey Smith.